How Father God Became.
This POST explains HOW The CREATOR (G-d The Father) BECAME (in Detail), in an exact manner that God has shown logically.
***PLEASE NOTE**This is for those that are not entangled in a religious way of thinking. I Will stay away from Calling the Creator Male or Female because neither is correct in logic/reason, it would be of both not only 1 or the other, neither does the Creator fit in the religious ideals or their gods/deities like the Yahweh/El God of the Bible. This description is talking about a CREATOR/Intelligent source who doesn’t ask for praise, blood, sacrifices, etc but encompasses all and surpasses minute physical things.**
SCIENCE CLAIMS NO CREATOR EXISTS, BUT A CREATOR DOES (There is ONLY one TRUE CREATOR/INTELLIGENT SOURCE that people falsely called G-d to which can be entitled to anyone):
Alright so, The Creator always shows the creation comes first. Although science has indeed helped to advance society and has much credibility and evidence (which is grabbed from the creation itself), science cannot prove everything because it’s forever “learning” from the creation itself. Science can’t always be certain, because it’s always subject to new data as well. In addition, without creation, science has no resources!!! So, science cannot explain and understand what, how, when, etc. Without it being created FIRST. Science studies the creation, never the “creator” studying science.
Showing further that The Creator comes first:
The answers that are given in a “scientific” manner are for us humans to understand, but the answers formulated (be it observed, tangible, empirical, etc.) come from the creation, and the creation is created first.
Science is limited simply because science uses tools to measure and science cannot explain outside of its own ability to measure. Lastly, science itself uses terms like “the God particle” and “Mitochondria Eve” (Mitochondria is located in the x chromosome = the cell that every human needs to live). So, science itself is using terms from the creative idea and dismissing the creator/creation idea of the representation of those terms *at the same time, which is contradictory and pure irony too. Science itself is showing you creation is first, by seeking the creation’s RESOURCES to explain the creation itself.
WHO OR WHAT CREATED THE CREATOR?
I will use linear logic and empirical evidence to show in detail that basically, “The Creator” created himself or itself and that it is itself. The Creator is SELF — 0 (like a circle, number 0). 0 is conception, — it is birth, like the woman’s womb (which is A space to create — 0). Technically the “creator”, would not necessarily have a “beginning or end” but this is the only way to show for our limited human understanding that the creator IS itself and created (or comes out of) itself.
The description of the full circle (0) would be relative to explain and I will explain it in the first person (being “you”). You would describe it as “first point/beginning” (the moment you placed your pencil down to “start” the circle) and “second point/end” (as you draw the circle, your “ending point” will be back to the “beginning point”). Which will create a “0” — space to create within it. So, in expression; for us to understand, the creator has a “beginning and end” but the creator does not at the same time because it is “itself” and doesn’t “need” a “starting or ending point”; it just “creates” it itself because it can, NOT out of “necessity” but out of ability.
Rather it is a scientific explanation or just a logical thought — it still is the same concept, which is to say “nothing cannot come from/create nothing”.
Still though: “nothing” is still “something” (in some expressions a “sum” of a thing). That “nothing” is “vacuum energy”, and so it is still “something”/a thing. So, in essence, the scientific explanation still shows that “things/a thing” formulates to expand out and “become”/“be”…even though it is that “thing” already. It shifts, formulates, and produces light (in other expressions “fire”). That “fire”, the “big bang” is those “things” (time, space, energy, matter) = which is to say simply particles (gases, etc.) It started forming with hydrogen and helium… (more than 10 million degrees) ….heating (fire, the consuming fire — “light”) became denser. God basically expanded out creating to the creation, expanding itself out, being its own force to do so. After the big bang, tiny particles bound together to form hydrogen and helium…the closer it fused it produced heavier the elements (nucleosynthesis).
Let there be “Light” is the “Big Bang”… an action, an expansion, and the ability to create from space (“0”). This is why you cannot “see” the creator’s “face” (too much heat, light, fire) and we can only get an EXPRESSION of the Creator’s image and likeness. IT is “light” and too much like (think of sunlight) could blind you, bend you, or cause you to die. The Creator IS LIGHT.
^^ALL of those actions is to form the CREATOR, which was PHYSICAL action. The elements, the expanding out, etc. are all PHYSICAL ACTIONS to which it became conscious of through the concept of DARKNESS and the space (of “0”).
In DARKNESS chaos occurs, darkness allows all possibilities, and simply order comes from entropy. So, This allowed the Creator to be “woke”/”conscious” (through the “heartbeat/core” and the Creator became aware of itself. The heart/core has been beating/alive since “13.8 billion years”.
If you put BOTH physical actions of the “MAN” and of the “WOMAN” together you get a FULL view of the CREATOR and HOW The Creator operates:
The Physical Self (MAN): self-supporting, self-sufficient, self-protecting…
The Emotional Self (aka the Heart/Core) (WOMAN): love, caring, light, balance, scales…
**In a nutshell, The Creator works with our core (who we are, inner feelings, emotions) and works with our physical (what we do/our actions).** There are social conditioning factors outside of this that influence MEN and WOMEN's actions as well.
I USE THE TERM CREATOR or “IT” (sometimes) TO DESCRIBE THE CREATOR because it is hard to place a name/title on the Creator because it is “ALL”/”EVERYTHING”:
Still, “the Creator/it” is not a negative connotation really. It is just an easier way to understand, there is no “physical” of the Creator in a sense of the physical here. So, the term “it” (The Creator) actually “encompasses” all/everything. The same way a person would say “IT is over there”. The thing being described as an “it” is still something/sum-of-thing that is itself/full. “It” can be a description of a — person, place, or a sum of a “thing”.
“IT” is a reference point to what “it” encompasses (the seen, unseen, known, unknown, etc.). So, “it” is an easier term to outline that describes more than enough beyond a physical description, that is why I use it to describe the creator.
IN SUMMARY OF THE ABOVE:
“The Creator” expands itself out, he chooses (the action, motion to do so) — to be itself. A full circle (“0”) — “in the expression” of what it is…has to be omniscient, omnipotent, Omni-intelligent. In expression further about a “full circle” — the circle is completed already (“full”)…The Creator expanded out to create itself as the “circle”…so it had to be the “circle” in order to expand out to make a complete “circle”: (1) so, it (the creator) has to be all-knowing because it is everything (the vacuum energy, the something that is “nothing”, the thing that is and the thing that produces something), (2) it has to be all-strong because it started it all (“science’s description called the “big bang”) — that’s powerful. (3) “The Creator” has to be everywhere because it is itself that produces all that is and all that is not.
The Creator exists and it is the DIVINE, the LIGHT/the all IN within all.✪
